Carousel crash course on fault tolerance

Fault tolerance is a difficult topic to get across. It’s technical, layered, and easy to lose track of the main thread. We started using carousels to explain fault tolerance because they gave us a way to break the subject into small, self-contained pieces, while still leaving space for some depth. Each one focuses on a single idea, but when read together they start to form a picture of how the pieces fit.

In this post, we’ve pulled together all of our carousels on fault tolerance into one place. You can think of it as a compact mini-curriculum that lets you explore the key concepts that make quantum fault tolerance so challenging yet remarkably possible.

Here’s what you’ll find:

  1. The quest for logical qubits: Many top QC teams are working on building logical qubits. Why?

  2. How to Read a Surface Code Diagram: Understanding the components and what they mean for error correction.

  3. The logic behind logical qubits: How logical qubits get us to near-perfect quantum computing.

  4. Quantum Fault Tolerance Thresholds: Your simple guide to interpreting threshold plots.

  5. Hardware doesn’t need to be perfect: But we need to understand all its imperfections to make quantum fault tolerance work.

  6. Not all errors are equal: Different types of errors shape quantum error correction thresholds in different ways.

  7. Shifting error thresholds: Using threshold surfaces to navigate multiple interacting imperfections.

  8. 99% gate fidelity: Is that all we need? Or is there more to the story?

  9. Why simulating FTQC is so hard: And how Plaquette + NVIDIA are changing that.

  10. What makes a fault-tolerant quantum computer possible? The four key components of a robust architecture and how they affect error correction.

  11. Do you really need 10000 physical qubits? Estimating overheads in Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing.

Together, these eleven carousels give you a crash course in one of the central problems of quantum computing: how to make imperfect devices act as if they were nearly perfect.

Do you have a favourite? Do you wish we covered anything else? Send us a message on LinkedIn or contact us here.

Next
Next

Do you really need 10000 physical qubits?